Yousaf accused! Then, afterl four or five months. Yousaf accused again came in the] house of my friend. Then, Yousaf accused had been coming in the house of my friend and I was called to attend the meetings. Then, in the year , Yousaf accused had. I was reluctant to some extent but Yousaf accused asked to pay Rs. Anyhow, I delayed this matter. Then, in the month of December, Yousaf accused came in the house of my friend to whom I informed that I have made arrangements for Rs.
Besides Yousaf accused, his companions and I, no one else had attended this meeting. After his departure from my house, I thought that as to whether I should continue such meeting or not and I decided that I should attend, the meetings with Yousaf accused. Commodore Retired Yousaf Siddiqui also attended the. At this stage, the learned District Attorney states that the remaining portion of the statement of the witness should be recorded in presence of accused.
PW is bound down for the next date. Before the making of the above mentioned permission by the District Attorney, the witness stated that his statement is over. But despite this, he may be put question by the District Attorney and that he is also to face cross-examination, therefore, he has to appear on the next date.
I identify him. I had been meeting with Yousaf, accused, present in the court, later on. I had been meeting Yousaf, accused, later on just to see the element working behind him. Saleem Abdur Rehman, learned defence counsel. It is incorrect that I never served as Brig, in the Pakistan Army. I specialized in the field of Radiology. If I have impression about a patient that he is having a broken bone, then in order to confirm my impression I shall refer him to Doctor or Specialist in the field.
I shall refer the patient to the Doctor, who is expert in performing the X-ray. It is correct that after examining the X-ray, I would confirm my impression that as to whether the bone is broken or not. My memory is already good because I am still working in the Hospital. My statement was recorded by the police. It was recorded in Karachi on It w as recorded in the house of Mr. Mohammad Akram Rana. No one was present at the time of recording my statement.
Akram Rana but they were not present at the time of recording of my statement. I was informed on telephone about recording of my statement. Mohammad Akram Rana informed me about recording of my statement.
Khushi Mohammad,. Sub-Inspector, had recorded my statement. It is incorrect to suggest that I made arrangements for availability of the prosecution witnesses at the time of recording my statement. Police told me that my statement is to be recorded in connection with a case registered against Yousaf at Lahore. I was informed about the nature of the case. It is incorrect to suggest that as a consequence of conspiracy and that I induced others to be witness in this case.
Akram Rana was known to me since Commodore Mr. Siddiqui was known to me since Noman Elahi was known to me since It is incorrect that I applied my spiritual guidance to call the above mentioned witnesses and to become witnesses in this case. It was not necessary to use my spiritual guidance for becoming of above mentioned persons as witnesses in this case because the above mentioned persons had their own grievance or views to become a witness in this case.
I did mention about giving an amount of rupees two lacs to the accused in my statement recorded under Section Cr. Confronted with Exh. DA, where there is no mention of giving an amount of rupees two lacs or where it is not so recorded.
I met Abdul Wahid finally in August, in his house. I had no contact directly or indirectly with Abdul Wahid after He never visited my house after I remember that Commodore Yousaf Siddiqui. I came to know about registration of this case on I came to record my statement.
My earlier reply is reply to the question that I came to know about the registration of the case on I did not read in any newspaper about registration of the case prior to I do not remember if I read about the progress in the case in the newspaper after I met Ismail Shujaabadi, complainant of this case, in Lahore to or three months after It is incorrect that I had met him prior to the registration of the case.
I have never gone to Multan for the last ten years. I cannot claim to be well conversant with the religion. At this stage, Mr. Ismail Qureshi, learned counsel for complainant has raised an objection that the legal question, as mentioned above, cannot be asked from the witness for testing his knowledge over the law. I do not remember as to when Yousaf, accused, was arrested in this case Even I do not remember the moth in which he was arrested.
When my statement was recorded, I cam to know that Yousaf, accused, was arrested in this case. I came to know through Abubakar that Yousaf, accused, has maintained a diary and I had seen the photo copy of the diary.
I know Tahir, Reporter of this Magazine. Tahir came to me and I expressed my views before him. I do not know if Tahir is witness in this case. I do not remember the details of my views expressed before him. It is incorrect to suggest that the allegations. It is correct that the photographs were published in this Magazine. It is incorrect to suggest that I had provided those photographs in the Magazine. I cannot tell about the edition of the Magazine in which the photographs of the accused were published.
However, I remember that the edition of the Magazine was relating to the month of April but I do not remember that the edition was published in the start of April or in the end of April but I do not remember that the edition was published in the start of April of in the end of April. It is incorrect to suggest that my memory is not correct. It is correct that there is dedication of this book. This book was published in Faisalabad and its edition came to me in the month of January, He has died.
Volunteers that I had sent the book and its dedication for publication in the month of September, and its edition after publication came to mt in the month of January, and that Yousaf, accused, was not exposed when the book was written by me or when the manuscript was sent for publication.
I did not ask the publisher to withdraw the dedication, particularly the word, as mentioned above. Volunteers that simply for the reason that after the pronouncement. I did not feel it necessary for deletion of the words, as mentioned above, in the dedication. Volunteers that later on in the edition the words, as mentioned above, were not used. Even the words, as mentioned above, were never written in any edition. Later on, in the dedication the words. Since I was with him, so the words in his appreciation were written in the dedication on his dictation.
The book Exh. DB was not written on the dictation of Yousaf, accused. Volunteers that this amount was got from me under coercion. However, it is correct that I did not pay the money, as mentioned above, on a gun point.
My financial position is stable. This question or the attested photo copy of the document cannot be put to the witnesses unless and until the original is brought. I do not remember the number of meetings which I attended with Yousaf, accused, after December, and prior to August, It is possible that I attended five or six meetings. I do not remember any specific subject which was discussed in the meetings in between the period, as mentioned above.
However, there was discussion on some subjects relating to the Holy Quran in those meetings. There was no such discussion on the subject to gambling, drinking and zina. Volunteers that I have already stated about the objectionable subjects discussed by Yousaf, accused. It is incorrect to suggest that my silence was deliberate. It is incorrect to suggest that I did not deliberately mention the month of December, in my statement under Section Cr.
It is incorrect that if some one gives an impression of a thing, the impression is taken otherwise by the person to whom the impression is given. Volunteers that the impression given by the accused was confirmed.
I have not read any press statement made by Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi relating to this case. Volunteers that as M. I have no concern with him with regard to his being a religious scholar. I have not read the FIR of this case. It is incorrect to suggest that Yousaf, accused, in meetings with me expressed his deep love and affection for the Holy Prophet P. It is correct that I am not one of those persons. It is. It might be that any Prophet perform prayer behind any one but it is not in my knowledge.
It is correct that if Ismail Shaujaabadi had not got the case registered, I will have not got the case registered. It is correct that I had asked to the police about nature of the case and that as to why my statement is being recorded. Police told me that who is the complainant in this case. Anyhow, I do not remember the exact sentences used by Yousaf, accused.
I do not. I personally know that Sohail Zia is witness in this case. I did not inquire from the police as to who provided my name to the police. Again said Akram Rana had provided my name. I did not bother to know as to who provided my name to the police. Noman is son-in-law of Rana Akram.
I do not know if the police employees stayed for one night in the house of Rana j Akram. I would assess the reality out of it by first assessing about the personality of the personal. My principles of! It is] incorrect that my reply is against the first Hadith ofj Bukhari Sharif. It is incorrect to suggest that my conflict with Yousaf,] accused, started in the month of December, It is incorrect to suggest that I have falsely deposed before this court.
It is incorrect to suggest that due to. Volunteers that it was in my knowledge that he had said some thing wrong but I was not sure that same is an offence under Pakistan Penal Code.
It is in my knowledge that Yousaf, accused, has written some books. I have heard those books. It is in my knowledge that Yousaf accused had written many articles in Pakistan Newspaper. I have not read all those articles. Volunteers that such article substantiates my statement in the court. I have read the press-clipping dated Note: In connection with, the above question, an application for summoning the original record of the newspaper was moved by the accused.
Therefore, the above question. As per my information Exh. Volunteers that I do not believe the press-clipping Exh. DD to be correct and I repudiate the same. It is incorrect to suggest that I have told a lie about the arrest of the accused. I have not read the books written by Allama Mohammad Iqbal completely. My date of birth is 27th January, Even I have read the Holy Quran entirely.
No one told. Allah Almighty. It is; incorrect to suggest that I. It Ts Incorrect to suggest that I havefdeposed against Yousaf, accused, due to personal enmity. I know Yousaf Ali, accused, present in the court. Yousaf Ali, accused, delivered speech in the! Prophet Peace Be Upon Him is present-in the worldi even today in the form of human being and also amongst! Besides it, Yousaf Ali, accused, said that if some one can see, he may see, and if some one can identify, he may identify the Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him to be present amongst us.
After it this meeting was over. The next meeting was held in the month of September, I asked a question to Yousaf Ali that? Anyhow, I said that I can pay an amount of rupees one lac for obtaining the book. Then this meeting was also over. Then I was receiving messages for payment of rupees one lac but I could not; pay. While going to Lahore Airport, in the vehicle alongwith two other companions of Yousaf] Ali, Yousaf Ali shortened his demand of rupees one lac.
But the time elapsed and I could not pay even the cash amount of rupees fifty thousand. Then, when I had to proceed for Hajj in the month of April, At that moment, many other people were present in the meeting held in the house of Abdul Wahid in Clifton, Karachi.
On hearing so, I felt that I was hypnotised by the words and dialogues spoken by Yousaf Ali, accused. On which I felt that I have to come out from this dilemma. Therefore, I consulted with the Ulma, to whom I narrated the above statement, on which the Ulma informed me that the.
Yousaf Ali, accused. One Aslam Sheikh had introduced about Yousaf Ali, accused. The subject of this speech was the recitation of Holy Quran. The relationship in between Pir and Murid is just teaching to the Murid Brig. Volunteers that I had informed him about the objectionable speech of Yousaf Ali, accused. I am Graduate. I read all the newspaper. I came to know about registration of the cas against Yousaf Ali, accused, in April, I also read about arrest of Yousaf Ali, accused, in the newspaper.
I have met the complainant of this case. I have met the complainant of this case after registration of the case. Since I had concern with the facts of this case, therefore, I met him. I had met him in the end of March, I had been meeting with the complainant after March, Note: Upon question put by the learned defence counsel, the witness has recited five Kalma and he could not recite sixth Kalma with perfection.
It is incorrect to suggest that I do not know the four conditions of Wazu. I do not know the verbatim of four conditions. However, I know the procedure of Wazu. Note: On question put by the learned defence counsel the witness has pointed out the procedure of Wazu from start to end.
I stated before police about month and year of my visit meeting with the accused. DD where it is not so recorded.
I did not state before police that Aslam Sheikh got the meeting arranged with the accused. I did not state before police that I met Yousaf, accused in his house situated in Shadman at Lahore. Aslam was present in that meeting. Volunteers that Brig Aslam was busy in his Wazifa after Maghrib prayer. I cannot say if Brig. Volunteers that he was away from me I stated before police that when I was present in another room, the intervening door was open.
Police recorded my statement in my house at Karachi and this statement was recorded on My statement was recorded in presence of Brig. Mohammad Arshad. I had called them in my house on telephone. It is incorrect that apart from Brig. Aslam etc. Police informed me to record the statements of Brig. A6lam etc. I had already their telephone numbers with me. It is incorrect to suggest that as to conspiracy all of them were already present.
I did not ask the police as to where from any particulars were obtained. It is incorrect to suggest that I called Mrs. It is incorrect to suggest that not simply I talked on telephone with wife of Yousaf, accused, but also attempted twice to abduct the daughter of Yousaf, accused. It is incorrect to suggest that I also stated that it was some spiritual power, who failed my designs.
It is correct that Noman Elahi, PW, in this case is my son-in-law. It is further correct that Aslam Sheikh is father of my son-in-law. It is incorrect that in the month of December, Volunteers that infact in Aprils I informed about such claim of Yousaf, accused to Brig. Aslam and then we exchanged our views and he stated that it is already in his knowledge and it appears as if some fraud is being played.
Besides me, Yousaf, accused, also claimed for himself to be Rasool Allah in presence of Yousaf Siddiqui. Commodore Brig. Arshad as well. In April, I had gone to perform Hajj and when I came back, then from July to September, the people contacted me that as to what happened with me because the incident of claiming as.
Rasool Allah by Yousaf, accused, was happening with all of them, and thereafter it started publishing in the newspaper about claim of Yousaf, accused and thereafter the press reporters also got me contacted with them. After publication in the newspaper I had been meeting with them.
I also read in the newspapers about claiming of Yousaf, accused, as Rasool Allah in between March and April, When I met Yousaf, accused, in the first meeting held in January, , Again said in the beginning of he stated that Mohammad Peace Be Upon Him is present in the Mehfil and if some one has got the power to see, he can see or smell or identify and I did not like this saying of Yousaf, accused.
Thereafter I had been meeting with Yousaf, accused in Lahore as well as in Karachi prior to September, Perhaps 15 to 16 times. Yousaf, accused, also spoke highly objectionable in those meetings.
Volunteers that in some indirect form. Since all these things were unnecessary, so I did not state about these things in my statement before police. I used to attend meetings to learn Holy Quran but besides that the sentences highly objectionable as stated by me above, were spoken by Yousaf, accused.
I do not know if the registration of the case was published in the newspaper on the next day. I had come to know about arrest of the accused within 2 or 3 days. I made my statement before police when it was desired by the police.
If the police had desired not to record my statement, even then I had stressed to record my statement or I had protested in the court. It is incorrect to suggest that I got recorded my statement late because I wished that the statement of the eye witnesses should be recorded first and under my supervision. Volunteers that every body was prepared to get the statement recorded.
I had given interview to the newspaper with regard to my statement. It was published on Volunteers that when the newspaper had approached me. I cannot say if the accused is an Alme-Din.
Volunteers that the accused acted as impostor as calculated by me. All such meetings prior to September, were arranged either inLahore on it Karachi. Four or Five meetings were arranged in the house of Abdul Wahid at Karachi. It is incorrect to suggest that I had not visited the house of Abdul Wahid. I can tell the location of the house of Abdul Wahid in karachi. It is incorrect that I am a man of ordinary prudence.
Volunteers that of a reasonoable prudence. It is incorrect to suggest that I could not understand the thinking of accused. Volunteers that when there was exposure in couple of meetings about accused, I had understood what he was. It is correct that once I went alongwith Yousaf, accused, in the said mosque. Volunteers that I was carried by Yousaf, accused, I had met Yousaf, accused, twice in between September, It is incorrect to suggest that besides the offering of keys and wives, the rest of the speech delivered by Yousaf, accused, was not objectionable.
The entire speech delivered by Yousaf, accused, was objectionable. Volunteers that it was all deception. The offering of keys and wives means that Yousaf, accused, was preparing the audience in such a way that they had prepared to produce their keys of the cars and wives.
In other words to surrender every thing. One Mr. Mohammad Arif produced his wife in my presence. The wife was present at the spot.
I do not know the name of the wife. Arif was residing in Gulshan Iqbal, Karachi. When Arif, produced his wife before Yousaf, accused, Yousaf, accused, said that I have accepted your gift.
Volunteers that one Masood Raza acted in the same manner at Lahore. I do not know his address. I do not know the name of his wife. It is incorrect to suggest that I have cooked up dirty and after thought story.
I have narrated these facts before the court today because out of discussion I had to narrate. I have not narrated these facts any where earlier.
It is incorrect to suggest that the names, as mentioned above, are fake. Volunteers that both the persons are available. I have not got their address with me. The wives were present in presence of 40 or 50 persons. Besides me, the offers were made in prsence of Brig. Arshad and Noman Elahi and Aslam Sheikh as well. Except Aslam Sheikh all are witnesses in this case. I met Yousaf, accused, in April, as well. It is correct that the above mentioned meeting was the last meeting with Yousaf, accused.
This meeting was held in Karachi. It is correct that I had been taking interest in this case because no case more than it could be an interesting case. I had read the contradiction got published by Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi stating therein that the accused had not committed any offence.
Volunteers that on the next day the explanatory statement of Maulana f Abdul Sattar Niazi was published in the newspaper that i he has been misguided by some one. It is correct that I read the press-clipping dated PA and thereafter there was another contradiction got published by Maulana Ghulam Sarwar Qadri on It is incorrect that my family members suffer from these disease. Volunteers that only my one son is mentally retarted. It is incorrect that myother family members also suffer from the disease, as mentioned above.
I do not know if the best courses for a person claiming himself to be Prophet or that the person should be treated mad. Volunteers that. I adopted the legal course.
I became witness against accused as a legal course and today I am standing in the court. I would have got the case registered against the accused if this case had not been registered. If this case had been registered in the year , I would have not waited for such a long period. It is incorrect to suggest that I have appeared as a witness in this case due to enmity. It is correct that in my opinion the accused has committed a major offence.
It is correct that Yousaf, accused, committed the major crime in the month of April, Moreover, while for that person I must say that you dirty man, what you have done. I did not carry him to the Police Station Volunteers that I myself as being the single witness was not enough. All these Fatwas were oral. Volunteers that the Fatwa given by Maulana Yousaf Ludhianwi was in writing.
I obtained these Fatwas in between July to December, or onward upto March, I obtained these Fatwas for confirmation of my views and also as second opinion. It is incorrect to suggest that I have appeared as a witness on the direction of Brig.
Aslam, my Murshid. It is correct that with the passage of time there is change in modern age. It is incorrect to suggest that I have falsely deposec today due to enmity.
Yousaf Ali, accused, claimed for himself to be the Prophet. He claimed for himself to be Mohammad-ur-Rasoolullah of this age. Yousaf, accused, tried to commit zina with the woman. He received the cash amount in lacs from.
He expressed his views, as mentioned above, on On application Exh. After registration of the case, I produced one audio cassette and one video cassette before the police. Audio Cassette Exh. P-2 and Video Cassette P-2 l-2 are present in the court, which I produced before the. Besides it, I produced 22 pages of diary of Yousaf, accused, which are Exh. P-3 l Articles P-l to P-3, as mentioned above, were taken into possession vide recovery memo Exh. PD, attested by me.
At this stage, the learned District Attorney also states that the Video Cassette produced in the court in the shape of Exh. P-l l-2 are infact two independent Video Cassettes, out of which one was produced before the Police by the complainant and the second one was produced by Athar Iqbal, PW, the separate recovery memo has been prepared.
I produced one audio Cassette one Video Cassette and 22 photo state pages of the diary of Yousaf, accused. The Audio Cassette is Exh. P-2 l-2 and actually I had produced only video one cassette Exh. Alongwith Application Exh. PC, photo copy of one page of diary Exh. P-4 was also produced by me. At this stage, the learned defence counsel has raised the objection that since the document Exh. P-4 is a photo state copy, so it is inadmissible in evidence. I have gone through the FIR of this case.
I had not compared my statement Exh. Since I had not compared the statement Exh. It is correct that with regard to the allegations in statement Exh. I am not witness of the spot. It is correct that Yousaf, accused, never claimed to be Prophet in my presence. It is correct that he levelled no allegation as contained in complaint Exh.
PC, in my presence. I have some religious knowledge. It is correct that I never met. Rupee moves towards all-time low. PSX downgraded to Frontier index. Pakistan to consider transit of Indian wheat to Afghanistan. Suhail Asghar passes away. The birth of stars. In praise of revolution. Saving your six and lingua frantica. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Let them do what they want. I will add only a few more points to answer your questions and to complete the hujjat: details on personal meeting inshallah. For now this should suffice. I am NOT a follower of that idiot Yusuf. But you should also try to study his case. Did he really claim to be a Prophet? Were sharia and sunnah requirements were fulfilled in the sessions court? Why no religious scholar appeared in the court to testify against him?
What was the judgment of council of Islamic ideology after this case verdict? In fact, Nawai Waqt and nation defended Yusuf by publishing statements of top scholars defending yusuf????? Was that a case of blasphemy or money disputes and sectarian warfare??? You MUST find this out. Life of every Muslim is sacred and cannot be taken on suspicion. Property of every Muslim of sacred and cannot be violated on suspicion. The last sermon of Rasul Allah equates life, property and honor with sacred day of Hajj and sacred city of Makka.
It is most unfortunate that those calling themselves as Muslims violate each and every basic tenant of Islam by involving themselves in utter and absolute Haram without any proof, sharia requirements or verifications.
If we believe in Allah and Rasul Allah and fear the day of judgment, then we should be very very careful when a Muslim is accused of being a Kafir or murtid or doing his Takfir.. This is greatest of sins. I left Karachi in and have never met any of these accusers ever since, if ever. All my life has been spent on razor edge for the sake of Allah and Rasul Allah saw , risking and sacrificing everything that is considered precious in this world for the sake of Sayyadna Rasul Allah saw and this deen.
I was 22 years old when I went to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets when a life of worldly promise and brilliant career awaited me in Dunya. Spent six year in battle fields, surviving on daily basis, with my parents, wife, kids and loved ones not knowing in which valley my grave would be.
I did not do all that for money, sense of adventure or to serve any secret service. When I came out after six years, i had to struggle on daily basis once again to feed and support my family. Jihad was NOT a paying venture. We spend from our own pockets or given most minor wazeefa of few hundred rupees per month by the jihadi commander we fought along with.
It is Not for money or to serve any secret agenda. We have done over 70 programs. Apart from being anything against Islam, Quran or sunnah, these are highly subtle, sublime and sophisticated essence of deen and khair reviving the Ummah and nation and attacking the entire exis of Kufr and Dajjal.
0コメント